You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 3 Outcomes (OS, TRM/NRM, RR) of included studies

From: Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells co-infusion in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Survival rates with a varied follow-up time
Author, year Intervention group, HSCT+MSC Control group, HSCT P value
Follow-up, months Survival Follow-up, months Survival
Ball, 2007 [16] Range 3–28 OS 72% Range 32–110 OS 63% Not reported
RR 18% RR 26% Not reported
Daganzo, 2009 [30] Median 7.4, range 1–22 OS 89% Median 24, range 1–107 OS 53% = 0.19
RR 11% at 22 months RR 13% at 60 months Not reported
DFS 71% DFS 45% Not reported
TRM 11% (95% CI 2–71) TRM 37% (95% CI 25–54) Not reported
Wu, 2013b [28] Median 16.5, range 11–27 OS 75% Median 18.5, range 12–31 OS 67% > 0.05
RR 25% RR 16.67% Not reported
TRM 25% TRM 33% > 0.05
Wu, 2013a [34] Median 27, range 24–31 OS 80% Not reported OS 56% = 0.58
TRM 0% TRM 22.2% = 0.51
Survival measured at fixed measure points
Author, year Intervention group, HSCT+MSCs Control group, HSCT P value
Measure time point, years Survival Measure time point, years Survival
Baron, 2010 [32] 1 OS 60% 1 OS 38% = 0.1
DFS 5% DFS 0% > 0.05
TRM 10% TRM 37% = 0.02*
RR 30% RR 25% = 0.9
Zhang, 2015 [37] 1 OS 72.7% 1 OS 85.2% = 0.472
RR 9.1% RR 22.2% = 0.396
CRR 9.1% CRR 33.3% = 0.093*
Xiang, 2017 [13] 1 OS 87% 1 OS 75% = 0.202
CRR 16% CRR 25% = 0.351
Lee, 2013 [14] 2 OS 85.7% 2 OS 55.6% = 0.15
Liu, 2011 [22] 2 OS 69.7% 2 OS 64.3% = 0.737
RR 12.8% RR 9.3% = 0.721
MacMillan, 2009 [31] 3 OS 75% (95% CI 45–100) 3 OS 46% (95% CI 26–66) = 0.38
Ning, 2008 [24] 3 OS 40% 3 OS 66.7% Not reported
DFS 30% DFS 66.7% = 0.035*
RR 60.0% RR 20% = 0.020*
Bernardo, 2011 [15] 3 OS 63% (95% CI 43–97) 3 OS 64% (95% CI 48–79) NS
DFS 67% (95% CI 41–94) DFS 56% (95% CI 40–72) NS
TRM 8% (95% CI 1–51) TRM 21% (95% CI 11–38) NS
RR 25% (95% CI 9–67) RR 23% (95% CI 13–42) NS
Kang, 2017 [38] 3 OS 70.6% 3 OS 23.1 = 0.004*
DFS 52.9% DFS 0% = 0*
TRM 11.8% TRM 46.2% = 0.017*
RR 32.4% RR 53.8% = 0.199
Ghavamzadeh, 2017 [39] 3 OS 70% 3 OS 61% = 0.78
DFS 54% DFS 61% = 0.35
Mareika, 2016 [29] > 3 OS (90 ± 9.5)% > 3 OS (83 ± 10.7)% Not reported
RR 10% RR 0% Not reported
  1. OS overall survival, TRM/NRM treatment-related mortality/non-relapse mortality, RR relapse rate, DFS disease free survival, CRR cumulative relapse rate, NS not significant
  2. *Statistically significant
\